| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 7 post(s) |

Max Kolonko
WATAHA. Fidelas Constans
579
|
Posted - 2015.12.18 12:53:04 -
[1] - Quote
Hey FoxFour, what if instead of nuking it completly just remove all igb integration. So no location cia headers and no igb java script. But leave it as an in-game browser for links.
Maybe thus way you dont have to make new version everytime chromium get updated?
And we can still use crest tools in game without alt tabing.
Also i have only one monitor so its kind of touchy subject for me and all overlay browsers ive tried are s#?!t compared to igb. And no, im not going to rearrange my apartament to fit second monitor unless i see two monitors on eve online minimal system requirements page.
Read and support:
Don't mess with OUR WH's
What is Your stance on WH stuff?
|

Max Kolonko
WATAHA. Fidelas Constans
579
|
Posted - 2015.12.19 15:54:56 -
[2] - Quote
CCP FoxFour wrote:Max Kolonko wrote:Also i have only one monitor so its kind of touchy subject for me and all overlay browsers ive tried are s#?!t compared to igb. And no, im not going to rearrange my apartament to fit second monitor unless i see two monitors on eve online minimal system requirements page. What do you use the IGB for?
Siggy obviously to map whs, to set dedtination to/from entrence and show info on system
Dotlan and other map tools to set destination, add waypoints and show info on sysyems
Dotlan radar to see where i am (tell ui guys to fix map btw, its beauty but not much location awareness available)
Fleetup to open market for specific item and ingame fit screen
Various market tools to open market info on item and show info
ZKillboard links from chat
Adashboard and other intell tools to copy paste stuf from game into page or read others results
Paplinks
Cat pics from chat
UNTILL RECENTLY FOR GDOCS HEAVILY
I think that covers most of my usage
Read and support:
Don't mess with OUR WH's
What is Your stance on WH stuff?
|

Max Kolonko
WATAHA. Fidelas Constans
582
|
Posted - 2016.01.04 10:39:17 -
[3] - Quote
Kelath Erebus wrote:I posted this in another browser related thread. But...
Since you're set on removing the browser app, perhaps replace it with a beacon app. What I mean is, a pilot clicks on the app and can enter a series of URLs perhaps with a status toggle (on/off). Every time a pilot switches systems the beacon app fires a JSON formatted POST to the URLs that are "on".
This would allow for pilots to send the data in the browser header to the websites in a nicely formatted manner, without having to continue to manage the in-game browser in all its modified glory.
This could be expanded down the road, so perhaps specific actions fire off the beacon. I could see this useful for mining, for instance next to the URL in the beacon app there is a "config/settings/options" button. Select that and a modal pops-up providing the pilot the ability to choose what data they want sent to the URL, include additional things that perhaps are already logged locally, like mining data, combat data. It would be infinitely useful to have such data automatically sent to web applications for consumption when they occur.
I would imagine the above would be a lot easier to manage then the full modified web browser, while still providing the pilots of EVE the ability to send live data to web applications and potentially data that isn't already available over time. The possibilities are endless and they wouldn't tax the EVE servers as much I would imagine as if we have to ping the CREST server constantly on combat opps for locational data on fleet activities.
Just my two cents!
Dont You worry about taxing on eve servers. Market crest can accept few houndred requests per second per user, so i dont see problem with few thousands requests per second server wide.
Since location CREST is coming anyay I dont see how creating yet another way of comunicating between client and server to be viable.
The plus/downside of CREST is that once you register with your credentials into the app and allow access to certain informations about your character you dont even need to have it opened on your end (think like siggy - where you need it opened for it to work) and it can still work server side, reading Your location every now and then and doind its stuff with it (like siggy with all cor regustered always working without them needing to open it in or out of game to draw a map - you only open it to view the map itself).
Read and support:
Don't mess with OUR WH's
What is Your stance on WH stuff?
|

Max Kolonko
WATAHA. Fidelas Constans
582
|
Posted - 2016.01.04 12:37:53 -
[4] - Quote
CCP Foxfour - I would like to add another point FOR keeping IGB (as a pure browser without build in eve integration like headers and js library - just pure in game browser, with crest to work as actual browser-server communication engine)
Interface-wise IGB is part of eve UI, it can be covered by other windows I open. Any DirectX overlay will be always on top. Especially for "always open apps" (like siggy, where you want them on screen all the time) this will be frustrating as you will need to close/minimize them before doing other stuff.
Right now You can open other EVE window that will simply cover the browser, you can always click on it to bring it back, etc
Read and support:
Don't mess with OUR WH's
What is Your stance on WH stuff?
|

Max Kolonko
WATAHA. Fidelas Constans
582
|
Posted - 2016.01.05 10:49:56 -
[5] - Quote
Kelath Erebus wrote:Thanks for the informative post Max, I didn't quiet understand how CREST works (which is an issue I'm working on rectifying right now with a few projects), With the way you put it, then yes, I don't see any issue at all with the removal of IGB apart from it being nice to have an in-game browser now and again that is fully integrated with the game UI.
Emphasis on the most important aspect of IGB removal and why I'm oposing it (Esecially that I am in a single monitor situation without hope of redemption without redesigned layout of my apartament)
Read and support:
Don't mess with OUR WH's
What is Your stance on WH stuff?
|
| |
|